![]() The tests made by CrystalDiskMark check the reading. Users can decide the number of tests they want to do, the size (in megabytes) of the test, and the drive they want to test. In RND4K Q1T1 data the Samsung 970 EVO 1TB also provides higher write performance by 22%. CrystalDiskMark is a small tool that allows you to carry out different tests on the drives of your computer to check the performance when it has to read or write data. It literally has double the write performance which is a really big deal. In RND4K Q32T16 the Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB destroys the XPG SX8100NP in read and write performance. Now we come to the random data performance. Seven of the eight CrystalDiskMark scores did improve but the difference was so. Diskmark scores software#However, the tables really turn on the write speed with the Samsung 970 Evo 1TB providing 26% more write performance, which is quite a difference. The results for the RAM Disk software will give you an idea of how much. We aren’t sure why, but we double-checked the result and it was true. This time the XPG SSD takes the lead by a large margin, 14%. On SEQ1M Q1T1 data there’s a huge difference in the read performance. This is a great start for sequential data. On Write the Samsung 970 EVO 1TB SSD is 10% faster on write speeds and reaches its rated 2500MB/s write speed. The Samsung 970 EVO 1TB SSD is about 3% faster on read performance and achieves over the 3400MB/s rated speed up to 3570MB/s which is excellent. 280GB Intel Optane 900P PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD. Diskmark scores plus#(2) 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus M.2 PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD. Diskmark scores pro#Here are my results with a Samsung 850 Pro SSD. In this first graph, we are comparing the Samsung 970 EVO 1TB SSD to the XPG SX8100NP 2TB SSD in CrystalDiskMark SEQ1M Q8T1 Read and Write. What Six Drives Do We Have 500GB Samsung 980 PRO M.2 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD. There seems to be something off about your Samsung EVO SSD results over ATA. We get substantially different results, depending on whether we are testing with our AMD Gen 4 system or the newest Intel Gen 4 Bench.As you read through the data remember the specific specifications for the model MZ-V7E1T0BW Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB drive we have are rated at 3400MB/s Sequential Read and 2500MB/s Sequential Write. Throughput highs of 7GB/s read and write as well as read and write IOPS above the million mark is outstanding. Performance is virtually identical, regardless of data sample so we have included only that using random data samples.Ĭrystal DiskMark results for the Seagate FireCuda 530 are just about the best we have seen in our Intel Gen 4 Test Bench. test on it and see what its condition is currently. IMO these are pretty OK speeds for a HDD, but if you have any suspicions regarding the performance of the hard disk you can run an additional S.M.A.R.T. Manufacturers prefer this method of testing as it deals with raw (compressible) data rather than random (includes incompressible data) which, although more realistic, results in lower performance results.ĪTTO performance is a bit lower than listed specifications with result highs of 6.59GB/s read and 6.31GB/s write.Ĭrystal Disk Benchmark is used to measure read and write performance through sampling of random data which is, for the most part, incompressible. Test : 1024 MiB C: 20.3 (188.9/931.1 GiB) (x5) Interval5 sec Hi there. ATTO uses RAW or compressible data and, for our benchmarks, we use a set length of 256mb and test both the read and write performance of various transfer sizes ranging from 0.5 to 8192kb. ATTO Disk Benchmark is perhaps one of the oldest benchmarks going and is definitely the main staple for manufacturer performance specifications. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |